![]() ![]() If it would support low latencies is beyond my knowledge and also if it would be naturally achievable or if the intermediate layer would have to jump through several hoops and loops to support that. It appeared to to be a somewhat old fashioned API that wasn't interfacable to LabVIEW without a good intermediate shared library layer. Maybe someone can help me to use a faster software interface (ASIO?). But the response time of MME seems in-depending on it. In order to collect this data amount the time what the PC needs should be theoretical 6,25/12,5ms plus data transfer time and some reaction times of the system modules. I tried also with small sample packages of 6 byte/chn and a sound card acquisition rate of 96kS/s. About 350ms latency and not really depending of the system load. ![]() But the input data comes with some hundred milliseconds lateness. Has someone use ASIO4ALL for audio input?įor sound out I use Midi via MME and the Windows own synthesizer. Since LabVIEW uses only Windows MME driver for sound in and out, I'm looking for an other way to get sound data into LabVIEW with much less latency. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |